Variation in physiological host range in three strains of two species of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0199199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199199. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Knowledge of the host range of a biocontrol agent (BCA) is fundamental. Host range determines the BCA's economic potential, as well as the possible risk for non-target organisms. Entomopathogenic fungal strains belonging to the genus Beauveria are widely used as BCA, but our knowledge of their physiological host range is only partial. The aim of this study was to improve our understanding of the physiological host range of three Beauveria strains belonging to two species, B. hoplocheli and B. bassiana. We performed laboratory mortality bioassays to assess their pathogenicity and virulence against nine insect pests, belonging to three orders: Lepidoptera, Coleoptera and Diptera. Mortality rate, mean survival time and mycosis rate were used to estimate virulence. Pathogenicity was assessed as the capacity to cause a disease and induce mortality. Virulence was assessed as the severity of the disease based on mortality rate, mean survival time and mycosis rate. The results of this study revealed significant differences in the physiological host range of the three Beauveria strains tested. The three strains were pathogenic to all Diptera and Lepidoptera species tested. In the case of the Coleoptera, only the B. hoplocheli strain was pathogenic to the white grub Hoplochelus marginalis and only the B. bassiana strains were pathogenic to Alphitobius diaperinus. The B. hoplocheli strain was less virulent on Lepidoptera and Diptera than the two B. bassiana strains. The latter both exhibited very similar virulence patterns. The fact that B. hoplocheli and B. bassiana strains have different host ranges means that they can be used as BCA to target different pests. Impacts on non-target insects across multiple orders cannot be ruled out in the absence of ecological host range studies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Beauveria / pathogenicity
  • Beauveria / physiology
  • Coleoptera / microbiology*
  • Host Specificity / physiology*
  • Host-Pathogen Interactions / physiology*
  • Pest Control, Biological*

Grants and funding

This work was co-funded by 1) the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rural-development-2014-2020_en), by the Conseil Départemental de La Réunion (http://www.cg974.fr/), by the Conseil Régional de La Réunion (https://www.regionreunion.com) and by the Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (https://www.cirad.fr/); 2) the French Ministère de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation (http://agriculture.gouv.fr/), the French Ministère de la Transition Ecologique et Solidaire (https://www.ecologique-solidaire.gouv.fr/) and received financial support from the Office National de l’Eau et des Milieux Aquatiques (http://www.onema.fr/) as part of the "Pour et Sur le Plan Ecophyto 2" AttractMyFly project; 3) the ANRT (Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie) through the CIFRE Ph.D grant N°2014/1446 of RC; 4) the Arysta LifeScience Group. The role of the Arysta LifeScience Group was limited. to the choice of the Beauveria strains studied and to providing support in the form of salaries for authors CR, SB and MZ; it did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. All other funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This work was carried out on the Plant Protection Platform which is co-financed by the Groupe d’Intérêt Scientifique "Infrastructures en Biologie, Santé et Agronomie" (http://www.ibisa.net).