The Authors Respond: Reframing the Value of Treatments for Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jul;24(7):712-713. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.7.712.

Abstract

Funding for the Carlson et al. study was provided in part by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Ollendorf, Synnott, Chapman, and Pearson disclosed grants from Blue Shield of California Foundation, California Health Care Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Aetna, AHIP, Anthem, Blue Shield of California, CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, OmedaRx, United Healthcare, Kaiser Permanente, Premera, AstraZeneca, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, National Pharmaceutical Council, Takeda, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Spark Therapeutics, Sanofi, Prime Therapeutics, and Health Care Service Corporation. Carlson disclosed grants from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review and personal fees from Seattle Genetics, Genentech, and Pfizer. Russo, Guzauskas, Liu, and Brouwer have nothing to disclose.

Publication types

  • Letter
  • Comment

MeSH terms

  • California
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Humans
  • Multiple Myeloma*
  • United States