A network meta-analysis provides new insight into fungicide scheduling for the control of Botrytis cinerea in vineyards

Pest Manag Sci. 2019 Feb;75(2):324-332. doi: 10.1002/ps.5116. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

Abstract

Background: Control of Botrytis bunch rot (BBR) is currently based on the application of fungicides at four timings corresponding to specific growth stages of vines: end of flowering (A), pre-bunch closure (B), veraison (C) and before harvest (D). The current research provides a network meta-analysis of 116 studies conducted between 1963 and 2016 in nine countries, in which 14 strategies (based on combinations of 1, 2, 3, or 4 sprays applied in A, B, C, and/or D) were compared.

Results: When a one-spray strategy was applied, BBR control was more effective with sprays applied in A, C, or D than B. With a two-spray strategy, strategy AC provided similar control as strategy BC; strategy CD also provided good control. For a 3-spray strategy, the best disease control was consistently obtained with strategy ACD. Four-spray strategy ABCD provided the best control but often involved needless sprays so that the routine application of four sprays is not justified.

Conclusions: Spraying at timing A seems to be very important for achieving efficient and flexible disease control. Flexibility is reduced by spraying at timing B rather than A. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Keywords: Botrytis bunch rot; disease management; grey mould; network meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Botrytis / drug effects*
  • Farms
  • Fungicides, Industrial / administration & dosage*
  • Network Meta-Analysis
  • Pest Control / methods*
  • Plant Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Vitis / microbiology*

Substances

  • Fungicides, Industrial