Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace

Appl Ergon. 2018 Jul:70:194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

Abstract

Previous research suggests that operators with high workload can distrust and then poorly monitor automation, which has been generally inferred from automation dependence behaviors. To test automation monitoring more directly, the current study measured operators' visual attention allocation, workload, and trust toward imperfect automation in a dynamic multitasking environment. Participants concurrently performed a manual tracking task with two levels of difficulty and a system monitoring task assisted by an unreliable signaling system. Eye movement data indicate that operators allocate less visual attention to monitor automation when the tracking task is more difficult. Participants reported reduced levels of trust toward the signaling system when the tracking task demanded more focused visual attention. Analyses revealed that trust mediated the relationship between the load of the tracking task and attention allocation in Experiment 1, an effect that was not replicated in Experiment 2. Results imply a complex process underlying task load, visual attention allocation, and automation trust during multitasking. Automation designers should consider operators' task load in multitasking workspaces to avoid reduced automation monitoring and distrust toward imperfect signaling systems.

Keywords: Attention allocation; Human-automation interaction; Human-machine systems; Trust.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Attention*
  • Automation*
  • Computer Simulation
  • Eye Movement Measurements
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Man-Machine Systems
  • Task Performance and Analysis
  • Trust / psychology*
  • Workload
  • Young Adult