Adequate statistical power in clinical trials is associated with the combination of a male first author and a female last author

Elife. 2018 Jun 5:7:e34412. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34412.

Abstract

Clinical trials have a vital role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of new treatments and interventions in medicine. A key characteristic of a clinical trial is its statistical power. Here we investigate whether the statistical power of a trial is related to the gender of first and last authors on the paper reporting the results of the trial. Based on an analysis of 31,873 clinical trials published between 1974 and 2017, we find that adequate statistical power was most often present in clinical trials with a male first author and a female last author (20.6%, 95% confidence interval 19.4-21.8%), and that this figure was significantly higher than the percentage for other gender combinations (12.5-13.5%; P<0.0001). The absolute number of female authors in clinical trials gradually increased over time, with the percentage of female last authors rising from 20.7% (1975-85) to 28.5% (after 2005). Our results demonstrate the importance of gender diversity in research collaborations and emphasize the need to increase the number of women in senior positions in medicine.

Keywords: Cochrane meta-analysis; clinical study; human; human biology; medicine; meta research; mixed sex collaborations; randomized controlled trial (RCT); statistical power.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Authorship*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Physicians
  • Publishing*
  • Research Personnel
  • Research Report

Grants and funding

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.