Comparing to ingroup and outgroup members: Do we assimilate, contrast, or neither?

J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(3):313-327. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1472546. Epub 2018 May 30.

Abstract

Previous work studying social comparisons suggests that people are likely to assimilate to ingroup members (e.g. Ledgerwood & Chaiken, 2007) but can also contrast from ingroup members if outgroup members are present (Blanton, Miller, & Dye, 2002). The present research built upon these findings by including a no-comparison control group to test for true contrast and assimilation effects. Across two studies, women primed with a gender-math stereotype received false feedback about their performance on a math task; and in some conditions, they learned of the performance of ostensible male and/or female co-participants. Relative to a no-comparison control, we did not see evidence of ingroup assimilation in either study. However, in both studies, we found that participants were likely to contrast their self-evaluations away from downward targets, regardless of group membership. This suggests that self-enhancement motivations may be stronger than the drive for ingroup assimilation.

Keywords: Assimilation; contrast; control groups; social comparison; stereotype threat.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Group Processes*
  • Humans
  • Self-Assessment*
  • Social Behavior*
  • Stereotyping*
  • Young Adult