Detection of Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma via Microfluidic Immunoassay and Single-Cell DNA Copy-Number Alteration Analysis of Captured Urinary-Exfoliated Tumor Cells

Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 15;78(14):4073-4085. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2615. Epub 2018 May 22.

Abstract

The increasing incidence of bladder cancer and its high rate of recurrence over a 5-year period necessitate the need for diagnosis and surveillance amelioration. Cystoscopy and urinary cytology are the current tools, and molecular techniques such as BTA stat, NMP22, survivin mRNA, and urovysion FISH have attracted attention; however, they suffer from insufficient sensitivity or specificity. We developed a novel microfluidic approach for harvesting intact urinary-exfoliated tumor cells (UETC), either individually or in clusters, in a clean and segregated environment, which is crucial to minimize cross-contamination and misreads. To reliably and accurately identify UETC, our quantitative immunoassay involved concurrent use of two oncoproteins CK20 and CD44v6 antigen. CK20 is an intermediate filament protein overexpressed in urothelial tumors, and CD44v6 is a membrane adhesion molecule closely associated with cell invasion, tumor progression, and metastatic spread. Single-cell whole-genome sequencing on 12 captured UETCs and copy number alteration analysis showed that 11/12 (91.7%) of the immunofluorescence-identified UETCs possessed genomic instability. A total of 79 patients with bladder cancer and 43 age-matched normal controls (NC) were enrolled in the study. We detected considerably higher UETC counts in patients with bladder cancer versus the NC group [53.3 (10.7-1001.9) vs. 0.0 (0-3.0) UETCs/10 mL; P < 0.0001]. For bladder cancer detection, a stratified 10-fold cross-validation of training data reveals an overall predictive accuracy of 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-0.93] with an 89.8% (95% CI, 71.5%-86.4%) for sensitivity and 71.5% (95% CI, 59.7%-83.3%) for specificity. Overall, the microfluidic immunoassay demonstrates increased sensitivity and specificity compared with other techniques for the detection of bladder cancer.Significance: A unique and promising diagnostic assay for bladder cancer is proposed with potential clinical utility as a complement for cytology. Cancer Res; 78(14); 4073-85. ©2018 AACR.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antigens, Neoplasm / genetics
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Cystoscopy / methods
  • DNA / genetics
  • DNA Copy Number Variations / genetics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunoassay / methods
  • Male
  • Microfluidics / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / genetics
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / pathology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Single-Cell Analysis / methods
  • Urinary Bladder / pathology
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / pathology*

Substances

  • Antigens, Neoplasm
  • DNA