Comparing efficacy of enteral nutrition plus ranitidine and enteral nutrition alone as stress ulcer prophylaxis

J Comp Eff Res. 2018 May;7(5):493-501. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0098. Epub 2018 May 18.

Abstract

Aim: Adequacy of enteral nutrition (EN) alone as stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of EN alone and ranitidine plus EN as SUP.

Method: Critically ill adults with indications to receive SUP were randomized to ranitidine 50 mg IV every 8 h plus EN (SUP) or EN alone (non-SUP) group for 7 days. Besides, endoscopy was performed at the time of recruitment and on day 7.

Results: During the study period, only one patient in each group of SUP and non-SUP experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. At the time of recruitment, gastric erosion and erythema were the most endoscopic findings in the SUP and non-SUP groups. These findings did not significantly change at the end of the study (p = 0.21).

Conclusion: EN was at least effective as ranitidine plus EN as SUP.

Keywords: enteral nutrition; prophylaxis; ranitidine; stress ulcer.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Critical Illness*
  • Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal
  • Enteral Nutrition / methods*
  • Female
  • Gastric Mucosa / pathology
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / etiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Peptic Ulcer / complications
  • Peptic Ulcer / prevention & control*
  • Ranitidine / administration & dosage*
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Ranitidine