Measurement of healthcare quality in atopic dermatitis - development and application of a set of quality indicators

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Dec;32(12):2237-2243. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15074. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

Abstract

Background: Quality indicators are essential tools for the assessment of health care, in particular for guideline-based procedures.

Objective: Development of a set of indicators for the evaluation of process and outcomes quality in atopic dermatitis (AD) care. Application of the indicators to a cross-sectional study and creation of a global process quality index.

Methods: An expert committee consisting of 10 members of the German guideline group on AD condensed potential quality indicators to a final set of 5 outcomes quality and 12 process quality indicators using a Delphi panel. The outcomes quality and 7 resp. 8 process quality indicators were retrospectively applied to a nationwide study on 1678 patients with atopic dermatitis (AtopicHealth). Each individual process quality indicator score was then summed up to a global index (ranges from 0 [no quality achieved] to 100 [full quality achieved]) displaying the quality of health care.

Results: In total, the global process quality index revealed a median value of 62.5 and did not or only slightly correlate to outcomes quality indicators like the median SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD; rp = 0.08), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; rp = 0.256) and Patient Benefit Index (PBI; rp = -0.151).

Conclusion: Process quality of AD care is moderate to good. The healthcare process quality index does not substantially correlate to the health status of AD patients measured by 5 different outcomes quality indicators. Further research should include the investigation of reliability, responsiveness and feasibility of the proposed quality indicators for AD.

MeSH terms

  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Delphi Technique
  • Dermatitis, Atopic / therapy*
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care*
  • Review Literature as Topic
  • Severity of Illness Index

Grants and funding