How well does a commercially available wearable device measure sleep in young athletes?

Chronobiol Int. 2018 Jun;35(6):754-758. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1466800. Epub 2018 May 11.

Abstract

The validity of a commercially available wearable device for measuring total sleep time was examined in a sample of well-trained young athletes during night-time sleep periods and daytime naps. Participants wore a FitBit HR Charge on their non-dominant wrist and had electrodes attached to their face and scalp to enable polysomnographic recordings of sleep in the laboratory. The FitBit automatically detected 24/30 night-time sleep periods but only 6/20 daytime naps. Compared with polysomnography, the FitBit overestimated total sleep time by an average of 52 ± 152 min for night-time sleep periods, and by 4 ± 8 min for daytime naps. It is important for athletes and practitioners to be aware of the limitations of wearable devices that automatically detect sleep duration.

Keywords: Total sleep time; accelerometer; sleep tracker; sport; validity.

MeSH terms

  • Actigraphy / methods
  • Athletes / psychology*
  • Circadian Rhythm / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Sleep / physiology*
  • Wakefulness / physiology
  • Wearable Electronic Devices*
  • Wrist / physiology