The case for not masking away repetitive DNA

Mob DNA. 2018 May 1:9:15. doi: 10.1186/s13100-018-0120-9. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

In the course of analyzing whole-genome data, it is common practice to mask or filter out repetitive regions of a genome, such as transposable elements and endogenous retroviruses, in order to focus only on genes and thus simplify the results. This Commentary is a plea from one member of the Mobile DNA community to all gene-centric researchers: please do not ignore the repetitive fraction of the genome. Please stop narrowing your findings by only analyzing a minority of the genome, and instead broaden your analyses to include the rich biology of repetitive and mobile DNA. In this article, I present four arguments supporting a case for retaining repetitive DNA in your genome-wide analysis.

Keywords: Filter; Genomics; Repeat mask; Repetitive DNA; Transposable element; Transposon.

Publication types

  • Editorial