Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

J Med Econ. 2018 Aug;21(8):793-798. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1474745. Epub 2018 May 29.

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this analysis was to assess healthcare resource utilization in the pivotal phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (NCT01564537), 722 patients with RRMM following 1-3 prior lines of therapy received Rd plus ixazomib (ixazomib-Rd; n = 360) or matching placebo (placebo-Rd; n = 362) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Healthcare resource utilization data were captured on Day 1 of each 28-day cycle, every 4 weeks during follow-up for progression-free survival, and every 12 weeks during subsequent follow-up, and included medical encounters (length of stay, inpatient, outpatient, and reason) and number of missing days from work or other activities for patients and caregivers.

Results: Exposure-adjusted rates of hospitalization were similar between the ixazomib-Rd and placebo-Rd arms, at 0.530 and 0.564 per patient year (ppy), respectively, as were outpatient visit rates (3.305 and 3.355 ppy). Mean length of hospitalization per patient was 10.0 and 10.8 days, respectively. In both arms, hospitalization and outpatient visit rates were higher in patients with two or three prior lines of treatment (ixazomib-Rd: 0.632 and 3.909 ppy; placebo-Rd: 0.774 and 3.539 ppy) compared with patients with one prior line (ixazomib-Rd: 0.460 and 2.888 ppy; placebo-Rd: 0.436 and 3.243 ppy). Patients and their caregivers who missed any work or other activity missed a median of 7 and 5 days in the ixazomib-Rd arm, respectively, vs 8 and 4 days with placebo-Rd.

Limitations: The study was not powered for a statistical comparison of healthcare resource utilization between treatment arms, nor did it capture costs associated with utilization of the identified healthcare resources.

Conclusions: This pre-specified analysis demonstrated that the all-oral triplet regimen of ixazomib added to Rd did not increase healthcare resource utilization compared with placebo-Rd.

Keywords: I00; I10; I15; Multiple myeloma; health economics; healthcare resource; ixazomib; relapsed/refractory.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Absenteeism
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / economics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Boron Compounds / economics
  • Boron Compounds / therapeutic use*
  • Dexamethasone / administration & dosage
  • Dexamethasone / therapeutic use*
  • Disease Progression
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Glycine / analogs & derivatives*
  • Glycine / economics
  • Glycine / therapeutic use
  • Health Resources / economics
  • Health Resources / statistics & numerical data*
  • Health Services / economics
  • Health Services / statistics & numerical data
  • Hospitalization / economics
  • Humans
  • Lenalidomide / administration & dosage
  • Lenalidomide / economics
  • Lenalidomide / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Econometric
  • Multiple Myeloma / drug therapy*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Boron Compounds
  • ixazomib
  • Dexamethasone
  • Lenalidomide
  • Glycine