Urine Reagent Strips Are Inaccurate for Assessing Hypohydration: A Brief Report

Clin J Sport Med. 2019 Nov;29(6):506-508. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000555.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the diagnostic ability of urine reagent strips to identify hypohydration based on urine specific gravity (USG).

Design: This study examined the agreement of USG between strips and refractometry with Bland-Altman, whereas the diagnostic ability of the strips to assess hypohydration was performed by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Setting: Arkansas high school football preseason practice.

Participants: Four hundred fourteen fresh urine samples were analyzed.

Main outcome measures: Urine specific gravity was assessed by both reagent strips and refractometry. Cutoffs of >1.020 and >1.025 were used for identifying hypohydration.

Results: Bland-Altman analysis showed agreement of the 2 methods. Overall diagnostic ability of the urine strip to identify hypohydration was fair (area under the curve 72%-78%). However, the sensitivity to correctly identify hypohydration was poor (63%-71%), and the specificity of correctly identifying euhydration was poor to fair (68%-83%).

Conclusion: The urine strip method is not valid for assessing hypohydration.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Dehydration / diagnosis*
  • Football / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Reagent Strips / standards*
  • Refractometry
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Specific Gravity
  • Urinalysis / methods*
  • Wrestling / physiology

Substances

  • Reagent Strips