Tackling the chronic disease burden: are there co-benefits from climate policy measures?

Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1259-1283. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0972-4. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Abstract

Each year, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) kill 40 million people worldwide and impose an estimated economic burden of $600 billion. Without effective policymaking, NCDs will continue to undermine health and economic systems globally. We propose that climate policy measures-such as carbon pricing-can yield significant health-related co-benefits aside from their intended greenhouse gas emission reduction. We simulate three carbon tax scenarios in the energy and food sector in Belgium and assess the resulting health-related co-benefits. These benefits originate from decreased exposure to two leading NCD risk factors: fine particulate matter and dietary regimes excessive in animal products. The carbon tax could prevent 42,300-78,800 Disability-Adjusted Life Years in Belgium, or save 0.6-1.1% of total health care expenditure and an additional 0.06-0.12% of Belgian GDP. We conclude that these health-related co-benefits should be included in the cost-benefit analysis of carbon pricing.

Keywords: Burden of disease; Carbon tax; Diet; Non-communicable disease; Particulate matter; Vegetarian.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Belgium
  • Carbon Dioxide / adverse effects
  • Carbon Dioxide / economics
  • Chronic Disease / economics*
  • Chronic Disease / prevention & control
  • Climate
  • Computer Simulation
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis / methods*
  • Diet
  • Disabled Persons
  • Health Expenditures
  • Health Policy
  • Humans
  • Meat / economics
  • Models, Econometric
  • Particulate Matter / adverse effects
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Taxes

Substances

  • Particulate Matter
  • Carbon Dioxide