Agricultural conservation practices can help mitigate the impact of climate change

Moges B Wagena; Zachary M Easton

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.110

Agricultural conservation practices can help mitigate the impact of climate change

Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1:635:132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.110. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

Authors

Moges B Wagena¹, Zachary M Easton²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
² Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. Electronic address: zeaston@vt.edu.

PMID: 29660717
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.110

Abstract

Agricultural conservation practices (CPs) are commonly implemented to reduce diffuse nutrient pollution. Climate change can complicate the development, implementation, and efficiency of agricultural CPs by altering hydrology, nutrient cycling, and erosion. This research quantifies the impact of climate change on hydrology, nutrient cycling, erosion, and the effectiveness of agricultural CP in the Susquehanna River Basin in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA. We develop, calibrate, and test the Soil and Water Assessment Tool-Variable Source Area (SWAT-VSA) model and select four CPs; buffer strips, strip-cropping, no-till, and tile drainage, to test their effectiveness in reducing climate change impacts on water quality. We force the model with six downscaled global climate models (GCMs) for a historic period (1990-2014) and two future scenario periods (2041-2065 and 2075-2099) and quantify the impact of climate change on hydrology, nitrate-N (NO₃-N), total N (TN), dissolved phosphorus (DP), total phosphorus (TP), and sediment export with and without CPs. We also test prioritizing CP installation on the 30% of agricultural lands that generate the most runoff (e.g., critical source areas-CSAs). Compared against the historical baseline and with no CPs, the ensemble model predictions indicate that climate change results in annual increases in flow (4.5±7.3%), surface runoff (3.5±6.1%), sediment export (28.5±18.2%) and TN export (9.5±5.1%), but decreases in NO₃-N (12±12.8%), DP (14±11.5), and TP (2.5±7.4%) export. When agricultural CPs are simulated most do not appreciably change the water balance, however, tile drainage and strip-cropping decrease surface runoff, sediment export, and DP/TP, while buffer strips reduce N export. Installing CPs on CSAs results in nearly the same level of performance for most practices and most pollutants. These results suggest that climate change will influence the performance of agricultural CPs and that targeting agricultural CPs to CSAs can provide nearly the same level of water quality effects as more widespread adoption.

Keywords: Agricultural conservation practices; Climate change; Critical sources areas; Nutrient cycling; SWAT-VSA.