Current treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis is total knee replacement. Given that the number of total knee replacement surgeries is expected to approach 3.48 million by 2030, understanding long-term failure is important. One of the preclinical tests for total knee replacements is carried out using mechanical wear testing under generic walking conditions. Used for this purpose is the International Standards Organization's generic walking profile. Recently this standard was updated by reversing the direction of anterior/posterior translation and internal/external rotation. The effects of this change have not been investigated, and therefore, it is unknown if comparisons between wear tests utilizing the old and new version of the standard are valid. In this study, we used a finite element model along with a frictional energy-based wear model to compare the kinematic inputs, contact conditions, and wear from the older and newer versions of the ISO standard. Simulator-tested components were used to validate the computational model. We found that there were no visible similarities in the contact conditions between the old and new versions of the standard. The new version of the standard had a lower wear rate but covered a larger portion of the articular surface. Locations of wear also varied considerably. The results of the study suggest that major differences between the old and new standard exist, and therefore, historical wear results should be compared with caution to newly obtained results.
Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty; finite element modeling/analysis [medical]; knee prostheses; orthopedic materials; standardized testing; wear analysis/testing [biomechanics].