Traction table versus double reverse traction repositor in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures

Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 13;8(1):5952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24317-y.

Abstract

A novel reduction technique of intramedullary nailing (IMN) for femoral shaft fractures was introduced, and in this study, its therapeutic effect was compared with patients treated with the traditional traction table. From November 2012 to August 2015, the patients with femoral shaft fractures fixed with anterograde IMN were reviewed. Seventy-four patients treated with the traction table and forty-eight patients treated with the double reverse traction repositor (DRTR) met the inclusion criteria of this study. The surgical time, blood loss, open reduction rate and complications were reviewed in this study. The fracture healing was assessed by the radiographs conducted at each follow-up. The functional outcome (hip and knee flexion, Harris Hip Score, and Lysholm knee score) was evaluated at the final follow-up. Average surgical time, blood loss, hip and knee flexion, and Harris Hip Score showed no difference (P > 0.05) between the two groups. However, the DRTR was superior to the traction table in fracture healing, Lysholm knee score, open reduction and complications rate (P < 0.05). Thus, we concluded that minimally invasive treatment of femoral shaft fractures could be obtained with the DRTR.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Bone Nails
  • Female
  • Femoral Fractures / surgery*
  • Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary / methods*
  • Fracture Healing / physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Recovery of Function / physiology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Traction / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome