Background: Thrombus located distal to the main or primary pulmonary arteries has been previously viewed as a relative contraindication to surgical pulmonary embolectomy. We compared outcomes for surgical pulmonary embolectomy for submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with central vs peripheral thrombus burden.
Methods: All consecutive patients (2011 to 2016) undergoing surgical pulmonary embolectomy at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography angiography of each patient was used to define central PE as any thrombus originating within the lateral pericardial borders (main or right/left pulmonary arteries). Peripheral PE was defined as thrombus exclusively beyond the lateral pericardial borders, involving the lobar pulmonary arteries or distal. The primary outcome was in-hospital and 90-day survival.
Results: We identified 70 patients: 52 (74%) with central PE and 18 (26%) with peripheral PE. Preoperative vital signs and right ventricular dysfunction were similar between the two groups. Compared with the central PE cohort, operative time was significantly longer in the peripheral PE group (191 vs 210 minutes, p < 0.005). Median right ventricular dysfunction decreased from moderate dysfunction preoperatively to no dysfunction at discharge in both groups. Overall 90-day survival was 94%, with 100% survival in patients with submassive PE in both cohorts.
Conclusions: This single-center experience demonstrates excellent overall outcomes for surgical pulmonary embolectomy, with resolution of right ventricular dysfunction and comparable morbidity and mortality for central and peripheral PE. In an experienced center and when physiologically warranted, surgical pulmonary embolectomy for peripheral distribution of thrombus is technically feasible and effective.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.