[Myoglobin: still a useful biomarker in 2017?]

Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2018 Apr 1;76(2):137-141. doi: 10.1684/abc.2018.1326.
[Article in French]

Abstract

The clinical biologist plays a role as a consultant for the relevant use of biological examination. Advisory activities of the medical laboratory may help physician in diagnosis or therapeutic algorithm, avoiding redundant ordering or useless tests. In this context, we performed a review of literature about the clinically interest of myoglobin assays. The indications of myoglobin's assays appear fairly limited. It is no longer mentioned in the European guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. In patients with rhabdomyolysis myoglobin is neither a diagnostic nor a prognostic criterion. Its interest in predicting the occurrence of acute renal failure is also discussed. The most recent clinico-biological score (such as the McMahon score) do not integrate it. In this context, we decided to stop performing myoglobin assay.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; appropriate prescription; myoglobin; rhabdomyolysis.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Acute Kidney Injury / diagnosis
  • Biomarkers* / analysis
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine / standards
  • Humans
  • Myoglobin / physiology*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Rhabdomyolysis / diagnosis

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Myoglobin