Comparison of microscopic and molecular enumeration methods for insect viruses: Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus as a case study

Abstract

Enumeration techniques were compared for quantification of the South African isolate of Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA), used as a biopesticide to control false codling moth (Thaumatotibia leucotreta), an insect pest of various fruits and nuts, including citrus. The routine enumeration method for CrleGV-SA virus particles in experimentation and production of CrleGV-SA biopesticides is dark field microscopy. This method was compared with spectrophotometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The purpose was to develop an accurate and reliable routine enumeration method for CrleGV-SA occlusion bodies (OBs) and to validate the use of dark field microscopy. Purified and semi-purified CrleGV-SA viral stocks were used. Spectrophotometry was not a suitable or accurate enumeration method. Dark field microscopy and SEM were accurate and statistically comparable (p = 0.064), validating the use of dark field microscopy as an enumeration method for granulovirus (GV). However, SEM has superior resolution and the advantage of easily distinguishing virus particles from debris in semi-purified viral stock preparations. A quantitative PCR technique has been developed based on use of specific oligonucleotide primers for the granulin gene. This has the advantage of not being affected by contamination with non-biological debris or biological material, which impact on the other methods.

Keywords: Biopesticides; Cryptophlebia leucotreta; Dark field microscopy; Granulovirus; Quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Scanning electron microscopy.