Survival comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with radioembolization versus nonoperative/interventional treatment

J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Apr;7(4):343-356. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0064. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the overall survival (OS) and liver cancer-specific survival of advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with those who received nonoperative/interventional treatment (NOT).

Materials & methods: A total of 12,520 HCC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were categorized by treatment with either radioembolization or NOT. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were conducted.

Results: The TARE group had both a significantly longer median overall survival than the NOT group (TARE = 9 months; NOT = 2 months; p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher probability of liver cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio = 0.474).

Conclusion: TARE appears to provide a significant survival advantage over the NOT population in advanced HCC patients.

Keywords: advanced hepatocellular carcinoma; comparative effectiveness; hazard ratio; liver cancer-specific survival; nonoperative treatment; overall survival; palliation; prognostic prediction.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / therapy*
  • Embolization, Therapeutic / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Palliative Care
  • Propensity Score
  • Radioisotopes / administration & dosage*
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Yttrium Radioisotopes / administration & dosage*

Substances

  • Radioisotopes
  • Yttrium Radioisotopes