Comparative Study of Early Postoperative Complications: Thoracic Anastomosis vs Cervical Anastomosis - in Esophageal Replacement with Gastric Graft

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2018 Jan-Feb;113(1):95-100. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.113.1.95.

Abstract

Gastric pull-up is the most commonly used procedure for esophageal replacement in both malignant and benign conditions. In our article we compare the differences in mortality and morbidity between thoracic anastomosis and cervical anastomosis during gastric pull-up. The study group comprised of 126 patients - 58 patients (56%) with cervical anastomosis and 68 patients (64%) with thoracic anastomosis. The overall mortality in the study group was 5.55% (7 patients), while the overall morbidity was higher at 28%. There were no significant differences between the two subgroups regarding mortality and morbidity, although the rate of anastomotic leakage was higher in the cervical subgroup (13.8% vs 1.5%). We recommend performing thoracic anastomosis during gastric pull-up whenever the location of the lesion allows it, since the procedure is safe, relatively easy to master and it shortens operating time by excluding the cervical approach.

Keywords: cervicalesophagogastricanastomosis; intrathoracicesophagogastricanastomosis; postesophagectomycomplications.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Anastomosis, Surgical* / methods
  • Esophagectomy* / methods
  • Esophagoplasty / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods
  • Stomach / transplantation*
  • Treatment Outcome