Who talks to whom about what? How interdisciplinary communication and knowledge of expertise distribution improve in integrated R&D labs

Ergonomics. 2018 Aug;61(8):1139-1153. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1449254. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

Abstract

Although several studies have examined the impact of open workspaces, there is still an on-going debate about its advantages and disadvantages. Our paper contributes to this debate by shedding light on three issues: the effect of open workspaces on (1) the flow of communication along and across hierarchical lines; (2) the content of communication; and (3) the specificities of open integrated laboratories. Our findings derive from a longitudinal case in a large pharmaceutical company that has relocated some R&D teams from enclosed to multi-space offices and labs. The relocation has resulted in (a) increased interdisciplinary communication, particularly at lower hierarchical levels, (b) a shift of the location of discussions and the content of conversations and (c) an improved knowledge about expertise distribution. Practitioner Summary: Communication is essential in knowledge-driven organisations. This article examines the impact of a relocation of R&D employees from enclosed to multi-space offices and labs on communication patterns. We explain how the new environment fosters interdisciplinary communication, shifts the location of discussions and increases the knowledge of expertise distribution.

Keywords: Knowledge work; distribution of expertise; face-to-face communication; integrated laboratory; workspace.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Drug Industry / organization & administration*
  • Efficiency, Organizational*
  • Ergonomics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Information Dissemination / methods
  • Interdisciplinary Communication*
  • Knowledge
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Workplace / organization & administration
  • Workplace / psychology*