Aims: Widespread availability of tertiary hospitals with catheterization facilities, although vigorously promoted, has yet to become a reality in many countries with economy in transition. We sought to evaluate the clinical profile and mortality of patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and either received reperfusion therapy or remained without reperfusion in Eastern Europe.
Methods and results: Data were obtained from the International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Transitional Countries (ISACS-TC; NCT01218776) on STEMI patients admitted to 57 hospitals in Eastern European countries from January 2010 to February 2015. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Of 7982 patients, 65 (0.8%) had a documented contraindication to reperfusion, 5973 (75.5%) received fibrinolysis ( n = 1032) or underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI; n = 4941), and 1944 patients (24.6%) did not receive any reperfusion therapy. The overall unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was 7.9%. Thirty-day mortality rates were higher in non-reperfusion patients (16.0 vs. 5.0% in the p-PCI group and 7.4% in fibrinolysis group). The strongest factors associated with not attempting reperfusion therapy among these patients were female sex (OR 1.29 CI 1.07-1.56), age (OR 1.02; CI 1.01-1.03), prior MI (OR 1.79; CI 1.38-2.32), prior cerebrovascular events (OR 1.87; CI 1.30-2.68), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.76; CI 1.22-2.53), Killip class >1 (OR 1.31; CI 1.06-1.62), and time to admission >12 h (OR 15.9; CI 13.1-19.3).
Conclusions: A substantial number of patients are still not offered any reperfusion therapy in many Eastern European countries with economy in transition, and this was associated with increased 30-day mortality. Time from symptoms onset to admission >12 h was the highest ranking among factors related to lack of reperfusion therapy. Quality improvement efforts should focus on minimizing delay to hospital admission among STEMI patients.