Clinical application of microsampling versus conventional sampling techniques in the quantitative bioanalysis of antibiotics: a systematic review

Bioanalysis. 2018 Mar;10(6):407-423. doi: 10.4155/bio-2017-0269. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

Abstract

Conventional sampling techniques for clinical pharmacokinetic studies often require the removal of large blood volumes from patients. This can result in a physiological or emotional burden, particularly for neonates or pediatric patients. Antibiotic pharmacokinetic studies are typically performed on healthy adults or general ward patients. These may not account for alterations to a patient's pathophysiology and can lead to suboptimal treatment. Microsampling offers an important opportunity for clinical pharmacokinetic studies in vulnerable patient populations, where smaller sample volumes can be collected. This systematic review provides a description of currently available microsampling techniques and an overview of studies reporting the quantitation and validation of antibiotics using microsampling. A comparison of microsampling to conventional sampling in clinical studies is included.

Keywords: clinical; microsampling; pharmacokinetics; quantitative; antibiotics.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology*
  • Biological Assay / methods*
  • Blood Specimen Collection / methods*
  • Humans
  • Specimen Handling / instrumentation*
  • Specimen Handling / methods

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents