Transcriptome variations among human embryonic stem cell lines are associated with their differentiation propensity

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192625. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have the potential to form any cell type in the body, making them attractive cell sources in drug screening, regenerative medicine, disease and developmental processes modeling. However, not all hESC lines have the equal potency to generate desired cell types in vitro. Significant variations have been observed for the differentiation efficiency of various human ESC lines. The precise underpinning molecular mechanisms are still unclear. In this work, we compared transcriptome variations of four hESC lines H7, HUES1, HUES8 and HUES9. We found that hESC lines have different gene expression profiles, and these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are significantly enriched in developmental processes, such as ectodermal, mesodermal and endodermal development. The enrichment difference between hESC lines was consistent with its lineage bias. Among these DEGs, some pluripotency factors and genes involved in signaling transduction showed great variations as well. The pleiotropic functions of these genes in controlling hESC identity and early lineage specification, implicated that different hESC lines may utilize distinct balance mechanisms to maintain pluripotent state. When the balance is broken in a certain environment, gene expression variation between them could impact on their different lineage specification behavior.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cell Differentiation*
  • Cells, Cultured
  • Embryonic Stem Cells / cytology
  • Embryonic Stem Cells / metabolism*
  • Humans
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Transcription Factors / metabolism
  • Transcriptome*

Substances

  • Transcription Factors

Grants and funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31401259 to XZ) and Shenzhen Municipal Government of China (No. JCYJ20140418203036946 to XZ). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. It was also supported by BGI-Shenzhen. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for CBS, JWZ, DMZ, JW, HMY, XZ, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.