For many years, family-based studies using linkage analysis represented the primary approach for identifying disease genes. This strategy is responsible for the identification of the greatest number of genes proven to cause human disease. However, technical advancements in next generation sequencing and high throughput genotyping, coupled with the apparent simplicity of association testing, led to the rejection of family-based studies and of linkage analysis. At present, genetic association methods, using case-control comparisons, have become the exclusive approach for detecting disease-related genes, particularly those underlying common, complex diseases. In this chapter, we present a historical overview of linkage analysis, including a description of how the approach works, as well as its strengths and weaknesses. We discuss how the transition from family-based studies to population comparison association studies led to a critical loss of information with respect to genetic etiology and inheritance, and we present historical and contemporary examples of linkage analysis "success stories" in identifying genes contributing to the development of human disease. Currently, linkage analysis is re-emerging as a useful approach for identifying disease genes, determining genetic parameters, and resolving genetic heterogeneity. We posit that the combination of linkage analysis, association testing, and high throughput sequencing provides a powerful approach for identifying disease-causing genes.
Keywords: Association analysis; BRCA1; Common disease; Crohn’s disease; Epilepsy; GWAS; Genetic heterogeneity; Linkage analysis; Phenotype; Recombination fraction.