Evaluation of nafamostat mesilate as an alternative anticoagulant during intermittent hemodialysis in healthy Beagle dogs

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate nafamostat mesilate (NM) as an alternative anticoagulant agent for intermittent hemodialysis (IHD).

Design: Prospective randomized study.

Setting: University teaching hospital.

Animals: Eighteen healthy Beagle dogs.

Interventions: In group 1 (n = 6), NM was administered at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/h during IHD for 5 hours. In group 2 (n = 6), NM was administered at a low dose of 0.25 mg/kg/h during IHD. In group 3 (n = 6), which was the control group, unfractionated heparin (UFH) was administered during IHD. The evaluated parameters included: the amount of residual blood clots in the blood chamber and arterial side of the dialyzer; the levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelets; and the prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and activated clotting time (ACT).

Measurements and main results: Groups 1 and 2 successfully completed IHD without serious coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation. The residual blood clotting in the blood chamber and arterial side of the dialyzer did not significantly differ in groups 1 and 2 compared to group 3 (group 1 vs group 3, P = 1.000; and group 2 vs group 3, P = 1.000). No significant differences were observed between pre- and posttreatment PTs in groups 1 (P = 0.476) and 2 (P = 0.597), between pre- and posttreatment aPTTs in groups 1 (P = 0.983) and 2 (P = 0.977), and between pre- and posttreatment ACT in groups 1 (P = 0.282) and 2 (P = 0.401). In group 3, a significant elevation of ACT was observed at the posttest (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The results of this study in healthy Beagle dogs suggest that NM at 0.25 mg/kg/h may be a valid alternative to UFH for IHD. Further studies are needed in patients at high risk of bleeding.

Keywords: anticoagulation; canine; dialysis; extracorporeal therapy; kidney injury; unfractionated heparin.