The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 3- vs. 6-monthly dispensing of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for stable HIV patients in community ART-refill groups in Zimbabwe: study protocol for a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial

Trials. 2018 Jan 29;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2469-y.

Abstract

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa is the world region with the greatest number of people eligible to receive antiretroviral treatment (ART). Less frequent dispensing of ART and community-based ART-delivery models are potential strategies to reduce the load on overburdened healthcare facilities and reduce the barriers for patients to access treatment. However, no large-scale trials have been conducted investigating patient outcomes or evaluating the cost-effectiveness of extended ART-dispensing intervals within community ART-delivery models. This trial will assess the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of providing ART refills on a 3 vs. a 6-monthly basis within community ART-refill groups (CARGs) for stable patients in Zimbabwe.

Methods: In this pragmatic, three-arm, parallel, unblinded, cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial, 30 clusters (healthcare facilities and associated CARGs) are allocated using stratified randomization in a 1:1:1 ratio to either (1) ART refills supplied 3-monthly from the health facility (control arm), (2) ART refills supplied 3-monthly within CARGs, or (3) ART refills supplied 6-monthly within CARGs. A CARG consists of 6-12 stable patients who meet in the community to receive ART refills and who provide support to one another. Stable adult ART patients with a baseline viral load < 1000 copies/ml will be invited to participate (1920 participants per arm). The primary outcome is the proportion of participants alive and retained in care 12 months after enrollment. Secondary outcomes (measured at 12 and 24 months) are the proportions achieving virological suppression, average provider cost per participant, provider cost per participant retained, cost per participant retained with virological suppression, and average patient-level costs to access treatment. Qualitative research will assess the acceptability of extended ART-dispensing intervals within CARGs to both providers and patients, and indicators of potential facility-level decongestion due to the interventions will be assessed.

Discussion: Cost-effective health system models that sustain high levels of patient retention are urgently needed to accommodate the large numbers of stable ART patients in sub-Saharan Africa. This will be the first trial to evaluate extended ART-dispensing intervals within a community-based ART distribution model, and results are intended to inform national and regional policy regarding their potential benefits to both the healthcare system and patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03238846 . Registered on 27 July 2017.

Keywords: Antiretroviral treatment; Cluster-randomized trial; Community ART-refill groups; Cost-effectiveness; Effectiveness; Extended dispensing interval; HIV; Multimonth dispensing; Sub-Saharan Africa; Zimbabwe.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial Protocol

MeSH terms

  • Anti-HIV Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-HIV Agents / economics*
  • Anti-HIV Agents / supply & distribution*
  • Community Pharmacy Services / economics*
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Costs*
  • Drug Prescriptions / economics
  • Equivalence Trials as Topic
  • HIV Infections / diagnosis
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy*
  • HIV Infections / economics*
  • HIV Infections / virology
  • Humans
  • Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Viral Load
  • Zimbabwe

Substances

  • Anti-HIV Agents

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03238846