Comparing clinician use of three ankle fracture classifications

JAAPA. 2018 Feb;31(2):36-39. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000529773.90897.9f.

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the accuracy and interrater reliability of US Army physician assistants (PAs) in identifying ankle fracture patterns using existing classification schemes.

Methods: Twenty-eight PAs reviewed criteria for stability, Danis-Weber, and Lauge-Hansen ankle fracture classification systems. Participants reviewed 45 ankle radiographs and independently rated each radiograph using these classification schemes.

Results: Participants were able to successfully identify ankle fracture stability in 82.1% of cases (95% CI, 77.6, 86.6) with established criteria. Using the Danis-Weber classification, accurate classification was achieved in 77.8% of cases (95% CI, 72.8, 82.7). The Lauge-Hansen classification system was least reliable, with accuracy of 54.5% (95% CI, 46, 63).

Conclusion: Referring PAs can reliably discern unstable ankle fractures in more than 80% of cases. Lauge-Hansen classification was significantly less accurate than the Danis-Weber system or criteria for stability. Good communication between orthopedic surgeons and PAs and an emphasis on PA orthopedic education can improve patient care.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Ankle Fractures / classification*
  • Ankle Fractures / diagnostic imaging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Military Medicine
  • Observer Variation
  • Physician Assistants / statistics & numerical data*
  • Radiography
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • United States