Objective: In clinical practice, split-thickness skin graft (STSG) transplantation remains the gold standard for covering large skin defects. Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal thickness of skin grafts. The purpose of our study was to compare the early healing processes of recipient and donor wounds after STSG transplantation using grafts of different thickness.
Method: This prospective, randomised clinical trial included 84 patients that underwent STSG transplantation surgery for post-burn, post-traumatic or postoperative skin defects. Patients were randomised to receive a skin graft of either 0.2mm, 0.3mm or 0.4mm thickness. After skin transplantation, the wound healing parameters of both the recipient and donor wounds were evaluated after three days, one week, two weeks and one month.
Results: The greatest mean epithelialisation scores and highest rate of complete wound epithelialisation were identified in the recipient and donor wounds of the 0.2mm transplant group, at all time points. When the recipient wound pain scores were evaluated, the greatest visual analogue scale (VAS) values were found in the 0.2mm transplant group. The opposite result was found for the donor wound, where the highest VAS scores were identified in the 0.4mm transplant group. There were no significant differences, at any follow-up period, when wound secretion, erythema, swelling, localised warmth and fluctuation were compared.
Conclusion: The early healing of recipient wounds after STSG transplantation with grafts of various thickness differed considerably, especially regarding wound epithelialisation and pain.
Keywords: autograft; burn; clinical trial; injuries and wounds; randomised; skin graft; treatment outcome.