Proposals for best-quality immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded brain tissue slides in forensics

Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jul;132(4):1103-1109. doi: 10.1007/s00414-017-1767-3. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become an integral part in forensic histopathology over the last decades. However, the underlying methods for IHC vary greatly depending on the institution, creating a lack of comparability. The aim of this study was to assess the optimal approach for different technical aspects of IHC, in order to improve and standardize this procedure. Therefore, qualitative results from manual and automatic IHC staining of brain samples were compared, as well as potential differences in suitability of common IHC glass slides. Further, possibilities of image digitalization and connected issues were investigated. In our study, automatic staining showed more consistent staining results, compared to manual staining procedures. Digitalization and digital post-processing facilitated direct analysis and analysis for reproducibility considerably. No differences were found for different commercially available microscopic glass slides regarding suitability of IHC brain researches, but a certain rate of tissue loss should be expected during the staining process.

Keywords: Biomarker; Evaluation; Forensic neuropathology; GFAP; Immunohistochemistry; Traumatic brain injury.

MeSH terms

  • Brain / pathology
  • Forensic Pathology / methods*
  • Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Immunohistochemistry / methods*
  • Paraffin Embedding
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Staining and Labeling / methods*

Substances

  • Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein