Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies' cultural milieu

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 3;13(1):e0189885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189885. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

This paper reports the framework, method and main findings of an analysis of cultural milieus in 4 European countries (Estonia, Greece, Italy, and UK). The analysis is based on a questionnaire applied to a sample built through a two-step procedure of post-hoc random selection from a broader dataset based on an online survey. Responses to the questionnaire were subjected to multidimensional analysis-a combination of Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Cluster Analysis. We identified 5 symbolic universes, that correspond to basic, embodied, affect-laden, generalized worldviews. People in this study see the world as either a) an ordered universe; b) a matter of interpersonal bond; c) a caring society; d) consisting of a niche of belongingness; e) a hostile place (others' world). These symbolic universes were also interpreted as semiotic capital: they reflect the capacity of a place to foster social and civic development. Moreover, the distribution of the symbolic universes, and therefore social and civic engagement, is demonstrated to be variable across the 4 countries in the analysis. Finally, we develop a retrospective reconstruction of the distribution of symbolic universes as well as the interplay between their current state and past, present and future socio-institutional scenarios.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cluster Analysis
  • Culture*
  • Europe
  • Forecasting
  • Models, Psychological

Grants and funding

The study is part of the Re.Cri.Re Project (www.recrire.eu), that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 649436 (https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/). All authors are members of the 15 institutions out of 16 institutions involved in the Re.Cri.Re project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, deision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.