No effect of conventional vs. minimally invasive surgical approach on clinical outcome and migration of a short stem total hip prosthesis at 2-year follow-up: A randomized controlled study

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Jan:51:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

Authors

Michael Schwarze¹, Stefan Budde², Gabriela von Lewinski², Henning Windhagen², Marie Christina Keller³, Frank Seehaus³, Christof Hurschler³, Thilo Floerkemeier²

Affiliations

¹ Laboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: schwarze.michael@mh-hannover.de.
² Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
³ Laboratory for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Hannover Medical School, Anna-von-Borries-Str. 1-7, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

PMID: 29287171
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.12.004

No abstract available

Keywords: Clinical scores; Migration; Primary THA; RSA; Short stem implant.

Publication types

Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip* / instrumentation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Osteoarthritis, Hip / surgery*
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure*