Electronic messaging and communication with living kidney donors

Clin Transplant. 2018 Feb;32(2):10.1111/ctr.13184. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13184. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

Abstract

New regulations require living kidney donor (LKD) follow-up for 2 years, but donor retention remains poor. Electronic communication (eg, text messaging and e-mail) might improve donor retention. To explore the possible impact of electronic communication, we recruited LKDs to participate in an exploratory study of communication via telephone, e-mail, or text messaging postdonation; communication through this study was purely optional and did not replace standard follow-up. Of 69 LKDs recruited, 3% requested telephone call, 52% e-mail, and 45% text messaging. Telephone response rate was 0%; these LKDs were subsequently excluded from analysis. Overall response rates with e-mail or text messaging at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 94%, 87%, 81%, 72%, and 72%. Lower response rates were seen in African Americans, even after adjusting for age, sex, and contact method (incidence rate ratio (IRR) nonresponse 2.07 5.8116.36 , P = .001). Text messaging had higher response rates than e-mail (IRR nonresponse 0.11 0.280.71 , P = .007). Rates of nonresponse were similar by sex (IRR 0.68, P = .4) and age (IRR 1.00, P > .9). In summary, LKDs strongly preferred electronic messaging over telephone and were highly responsive 2 years postdonation, even in this nonrequired, nonincentivized exploratory research study. These electronic communication tools can be automated and may improve regulatory compliance and postdonation care.

Keywords: communication; electronic messaging; follow-up; living kidney donor.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Communication*
  • Electronic Mail / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Living Donors*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Self Care*