Objective: The impact of obesity on spine surgery has been studied extensively, but only a few investigations have been focused on minimally invasive spinal fusion techniques and complication rates in normal-weight, preobese, or obese patients. Obesity was found to be a risk factor for intraoperative complications. Published data tend to favor minimal access surgery techniques (MAST) for obese patients. In a prospective study, we assessed the perioperative and postoperative complications of MAST in a large population of 187 patients.
Methods: We evaluated perioperative and postoperative complication rates in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fusion techniques of the lumbar spine in obese, preobese, and normal-weight patients, classified by body mass index (BMI). Lumbar MIS fusion was performed by interbody fusion procedures and posterolateral fusion. In cases of spinal stenosis, a laminotomy was performed (146 patients). Any harmful event occurring during or after surgery was included in the statistical analysis.
Results: No infection or severe wound healing disorder was encountered in the series. No significant difference in terms of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, blood loss, drainage, or length of hospital stay between the 3 BMI groups was encountered. More clinically insignificant hematomas were encountered in the preobese and obese groups (P = 0.013) than in the normal-weight patients. No significant difference was registered between the BMI or age groups regarding overall complication rates.
Conclusion: We conclude that preobese and obese patients are good candidates for MAST because BMI did not affect complication rates or duration of surgery.
Keywords: Degenerative lumbar disease; Minimally invasive spinal surgery; Obesity; Perioperative complication rate; Postoperative complication rate.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.