Anthropometric measurements and survival after a prostate cancer diagnosis

Br J Cancer. 2018 Feb 20;118(4):607-610. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.440. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the role of anthropometrics in prostate cancer survival is inconsistent. We examined the associations between anthropometric measures and survival outcomes.

Methods: Men diagnosed with prostate cancer (n=987) were recruited into a population-based case-control study between 1997 and 2000 then a prospective cohort study between 2000 and 2002 where anthropometric measurements (weight, height, body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio) were taken and participants were followed up to 19 years for survival outcomes. Cox proportional hazards were used to examine these associations.

Results: Survival analyses suggested no clear pattern of associations between post-diagnosis anthropometric measurements and all-cause mortality, prostate-specific mortality, first recurrence/progression or new primary cancer.

Conclusions: We did not find a significant trend relating anthropometrics to survival outcomes after prostate cancer diagnosis. Continued assessment of objective measurements of body composition over the life-course is warranted to determine true associations between anthropometrics and survival after prostate cancer.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Body Mass Index
  • Body Weight
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / mortality*
  • Survival Analysis
  • Waist Circumference

Grants and funding