Postexercise Fructose-Maltodextrin Ingestion Enhances Subsequent Endurance Capacity

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 May;50(5):1039-1045. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001516.

Abstract

Purpose: Restoring skeletal muscle and hepatic glycogen content during short-term (<6 h) recovery from prolonged exercise is pertinent for athletes seeking to maximize performance in repeated exercise bouts. Previous research suggests that coingestion of fructose-glucose carbohydrate sources augments hepatic and has equivalent effects on skeletal muscle glycogen storage during short-term recovery from prolonged exercise compared with isocaloric glucose ingestion. The aim of the present investigation was to determine whether this has a discernible effect on subsequent exercise capacity.

Methods: Eight trained endurance runners and triathletes performed two experimental trials in a single-blind, randomized, and counterbalanced crossover design. Trials involved treadmill running to exhaustion at 70% V˙O2max, a 4-h recovery with 90 g·h of glucose-maltodextrin (GLU + MAL) or fructose-maltodextrin (FRU + MAL) ingestion (1:1.5 ratio), and a second bout of treadmill running to exhaustion at 70% V˙O2max.

Results: Exercise capacity in bout 2 was significantly greater with FRU + MAL (81.4 ± 22.3 vs 61.4 ± 9.6 min, P = 0.02), a large magnitude effect (effect size = 1.84 ± 1.12, 32.4% ± 19.9%). Total carbohydrate oxidation rates were not significantly different during bout 1 or 2 between trials, although total carbohydrate oxidized in bout 2 was significantly greater with FRU + MAL (223 ± 66 vs 157 ± 26 g, P = 0.02). Ingested carbohydrate oxidation rates were greater during bout 2 with FRU + MAL (P = 0.001). Plasma glucose and nonesterified fatty acid concentrations were not significantly different between trials. Plasma lactate concentrations were significantly greater during recovery before bout 2 with FRU + MAL (P = 0.001). Self-reported nausea and stomach fullness during bout 2 were marginally in favor of FRU + MAL.

Conclusion: Short-term recovery of endurance capacity was significantly enhanced with FRU + MAL versus GLU + MAL ingestion during recovery.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Glucose / analysis
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dietary Carbohydrates / administration & dosage*
  • Fatigue
  • Fatty Acids, Nonesterified / blood
  • Female
  • Fructose / administration & dosage*
  • Humans
  • Lactic Acid / blood
  • Male
  • Muscle, Skeletal
  • Oxygen Consumption
  • Physical Endurance*
  • Polysaccharides / administration & dosage*
  • Running / physiology*
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena*

Substances

  • Blood Glucose
  • Dietary Carbohydrates
  • Fatty Acids, Nonesterified
  • Polysaccharides
  • Fructose
  • Lactic Acid
  • maltodextrin