Inhaler technique: does age matter? A systematic review

Eur Respir Rev. 2017 Dec 6;26(146):170055. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0055-2017. Print 2017 Dec 31.

Abstract

Poor inhaler technique and inferior asthma outcomes are evident in older adults. Reviews comparing metered dose inhaler (MDI) and dry powder inhaler (DPI) techniques across older adults and younger cohorts are scarce. This systematic review aimed to determine whether differences exist between such cohorts with regards to the number and type of MDI and DPI errors made. A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, Medline and PubMed from July 1 to December 31, 2016. Studies were selected in accordance with preset inclusion criteria, relevant data were extracted, and quality was assessed with validated checklists. 14 studies were identified. Evidence suggests a negative correlation between advancing age and correct technique across MDI and varying DPI devices when examined collectively. Differences appear to exist between older adult and younger cohorts prescribed MDIs in error types. There is evidence of age-associated differences in the number and type of inhaler technique errors. Further research is required to assess outcomes in individual DPIs, reproducibility and the effects of confounders.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Inhalation
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Asthma / drug therapy*
  • Asthma / physiopathology
  • Child
  • Dry Powder Inhalers*
  • Equipment Design
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Lung / drug effects*
  • Lung / physiopathology
  • Metered Dose Inhalers*
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Education as Topic*
  • Self Administration
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Anti-Asthmatic Agents