Reduced spore germination explains sensitivity of reef-building algae to climate change stressors

PLoS One. 2017 Dec 5;12(12):e0189122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189122. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Reduced seawater pH and changes in carbonate chemistry associated with ocean acidification (OA) decrease the recruitment of crustose coralline algae (CCAcf.), an important coral-reef builder. However, it is unclear whether the observed decline in recruitment is driven by impairment of spore germination, or post-settlement processes (e.g. space competition). To address this, we conducted an experiment using a dominant CCA, Porolithon cf. onkodes to test the independent and combined effects of OA, warming, and irradiance on its germination success and early development. Elevated CO2 negatively affected several processes of spore germination, including formation of the germination disc, initial growth, and germling survival. The magnitude of these effects varied depending on the levels of temperature and irradiance. For example, the combination of high CO2 and high temperature reduced formation of the germination disc, but this effect was independent of irradiance levels, while spore abnormalities increased under high CO2 and high temperature particularly in combination with low irradiance intensity. This study demonstrates that spore germination of CCA is impacted by the independent and interactive effects of OA, increasing seawater temperature and irradiance intensity. For the first time, this provides a mechanism for how the sensitivity of critical early life history processes to global change may drive declines of adult populations of key marine calcifiers.

MeSH terms

  • Carbon Dioxide / metabolism
  • Climate Change*
  • Coral Reefs*
  • Germination*
  • Seaweed / physiology*
  • Spores / growth & development*
  • Stress, Physiological*
  • Temperature

Substances

  • Carbon Dioxide

Grants and funding

This project was funded by the Australian Research Council (DP-120101778) and the Great Barrier Reef Foundation through grants awarded to GDP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.