The Power of Academic-Practitioner Collaboration to Enhance Science and Practice Integration: Injury and Violence Prevention Case Studies

J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jan/Feb;24 Suppl 1 Suppl, Injury and Violence Prevention(Suppl 1 INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION):S67-S74. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000675.

Abstract

One of the most substantial challenges facing the field of injury and violence prevention is bridging the gap between scientific knowledge and its real-world application to achieve population-level impact. Much synergy is gained when academic and practice communities collaborate; however, a number of barriers prevent better integration of science and practice. This article presents 3 examples of academic-practitioner collaborations, their approaches to working together to address injury and violence issues, and emerging indications of the impact on integrating research and practice. The examples fall along the spectrum of engagement with nonacademic partners as coinvestigators and knowledge producers. They also highlight the benefits of academic-community partnerships and the engaged scholarship model under which Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded Injury Control Research Centers operate to address the research-to-practice and practice-to-research gap.

MeSH terms

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. / organization & administration
  • Community-Institutional Relations
  • Humans
  • Interinstitutional Relations*
  • Motor Vehicles / standards
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Organizational Case Studies
  • Pennsylvania
  • Public Health Administration
  • Safety
  • Translational Research, Biomedical
  • United States
  • Universities* / organization & administration
  • Violence / prevention & control*
  • Wounds and Injuries / prevention & control*