Approaches for Differentiation and Interconverting GPCR Agonists and Antagonists

Methods Mol Biol. 2018:1705:265-296. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7465-8_12.

Abstract

Predicting the functional preferences of the ligands was always a highly demanding task, much harder that predicting whether a ligand can bind to the receptor. This is because of significant similarities of agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists which are binding usually in the same binding site of the receptor and only small structural changes can push receptor toward a particular activation state. For G protein-coupled receptors, due to a large progress in crystallization techniques and also in receptor thermal stabilization, it was possible to obtain a large number of high-quality structures of complexes of these receptors with agonists and non-agonists. Additionally, the long-time-scale molecular dynamics simulations revealed how the activation processes of GPCRs can take place. Using both theoretical and experimental knowledge it was possible to employ many clever and sophisticated methods which can help to differentiate agonists and non-agonists, so one can interconvert them in search of the optimal drug.

Keywords: Activation; Agonists; Fingerprints; GPCRs; Ligand docking; Molecular dynamics.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Computer Simulation
  • Crystallography, X-Ray
  • Drug Discovery* / methods
  • Ligands*
  • Molecular Conformation
  • Molecular Docking Simulation
  • Molecular Dynamics Simulation
  • Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled / agonists
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled / chemistry*

Substances

  • Ligands
  • Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled