Aggregate-level lead exposure, gun violence, homicide, and rape

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0187953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187953. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Context: An increasing body of research has linked the geographic distribution of lead with various indicators of criminal and antisocial behavior.

Objective: The current study, using data from an ongoing project related to lead exposure in St. Louis City, MO, analyzed the association between aggregate blood lead levels and specific indicators violent crime within the city.

Design: Ecological study.

Setting: St. Louis, Missouri.

Exposure measure: Blood lead levels.

Main outcome measure: Official reports of violent crimes were categorized as 1) crimes involving a firearm (yes/no), 2) assault crimes (with or without a firearm), 3) robbery crimes (with or without a firearm), 4) homicides and 5) rape.

Results: With the exception of rape, aggregate blood-lead levels were statistically significant predictors of violent crime at the census tract level. The risk ratios for each of the outcome measures were as follows: firearm crimes 1.03 (1.03-1.04), assault crimes 1.03 (1.02-1.03), robbery crimes 1.03 (1.02-1.04), homicide 1.03 (1.01, 1.04), and rape 1.01 (0.99-1.03).

Conclusions: Extending prior research in St. Louis, results suggest that aggregated lead exposure at the census tract level predicted crime outcomes, even after accounting for important sociological variables. Moving forward, a more developed understanding of aggregate level crime may necessitate a shift toward studying the synergy between sociological and biological risk factors such as lead exposure.

MeSH terms

  • Firearms*
  • Geography
  • Homicide / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Lead / blood*
  • Missouri / epidemiology
  • Rape / statistics & numerical data*
  • Violence / statistics & numerical data*

Substances

  • Lead

Grants and funding

None of the authors received direct funding for the current project. The original lead data was supported with HUD funding, however, that grant (administered by Roger Lewis), played no role in the current study (either conceptualization or analysis). (In particular, the original grant information was as follows: The Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes, HUDLTSMOLHTO162-07. Robert F. Weisberg,PhD, grant officer.)