Epigenetic differences between naïve and primed pluripotent stem cells

Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018 Apr;75(7):1191-1203. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2703-x. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

Abstract

It has been 8 years since the concept of naïve and primed pluripotent stem cell states was first proposed. Both are states of pluripotency, but exhibit slightly different properties. The naïve state represents the cellular state of the preimplantation mouse blastocyst inner cell mass, while the primed state is representative of the post-implantation epiblast cells. These two cell types exhibit clearly distinct developmental potential, as evidenced by the fact that naïve cells are able to contribute to blastocyst chimeras, while primed cells cannot. However, the epigenetic differences that underlie the distinct developmental potential of these cell types remain unclear, which is rather surprising given the large amount of active investigation over the years. Elucidating such epigenetic differences should lead to a better understanding of the fundamental properties of these states of pluripotency and the means by which the naïve-to-primed transition occurs, which may provide insights into the essence of stem cell commitment.

Keywords: Embryonic stem cells (ESCs); Epiblast-derived stem cells (EpiSCs); Epigenetics; Naïve and primed pluripotency; Three-dimensional (3D) genome organization; X-chromosome inactivation (XCI).

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Blastocyst Inner Cell Mass / metabolism*
  • Cell Differentiation / genetics
  • Epigenesis, Genetic*
  • Germ Layers / metabolism*
  • Humans
  • Mice
  • Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells / metabolism*
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells / metabolism*