Background: Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior foraminotomy (PF) are standard treatment options for cervical radiculopathy due to disk prolapse. Which method produces superior results has not yet been established. One reason for the dilemma, among others, is a lack of detailed outcome analysis in previous studies. We quantified outcome to compare both methods in our retrospective single-center series.
Method: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 107 patients with cervical radiculopathy who were operated on via ACDF or via PF. Demographic data, symptoms, neurologic status, and pathology were recorded and correlated to outcome parameters such as Odom's criteria, visual analog scale values of radicular pain, Neck Disability Index values, and subjective satisfaction, which were also compared between both treatment groups. Intraoperative data, early and late complications, and reoperations were recorded and compared between both surgical groups.
Results: None of the recorded preoperative data were predictive for postoperative outcome parameters. Patients in the PF group reported better overall outcome (Odom's criteria) and greater relief of radicular and neck pain. Operative time and blood loss were less in the PF group. Both groups showed comparable early complication rates, but PF patients tended to have more late reoperations.
Conclusion: Due to a better overall outcome as well as greater relief of radicular and neck pain in our cohort, we consider PF the first-line treatment if morphology of the pathology is suitable.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.