Australia's Health Star Rating policy process: Lessons for global policy-making in front-of-pack nutrition labelling

Nutr Diet. 2018 Apr;75(2):193-199. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12393. Epub 2017 Nov 12.

Abstract

Aim: This study explored factors that shaped the development of Australia's Health Star Rating system for front-of-pack labelling (FoPL) on packaged foods and whether insights could be drawn from this experience to inform the development of global FoPL standards.

Methods: Ten individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with public health or consumer advocates, academics in the field of nutrition labelling and policy, a food industry employee, and Australian public servants. Thematic analysis was undertaken, guided by Kingdon's Multiple Streams Framework, to identify factors which shaped Australian and international FoPL policy processes.

Results: Senior Australian bureaucrats played the policy entrepreneur role to facilitate the development of the Health Star Rating system. The public health and consumer advocacy groups formed an alliance to counter-balance the influence of the food industry in the Health Star Rating development process. Public health and consumer groups have less influence at Codex Alimentarius, where policy-making is constrained by political alliances and consensus voting structures.

Conclusions: Strong leadership, policy entrepreneurship and a coherent alliance between public health and consumer groups enabled the development of a FoPL system in Australia and could contribute to advancing FoPL standards at the international level.

Keywords: food labelling; health star rating; public health advocates; qualitative research.

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Consumer Advocacy
  • Consumer Behavior
  • Food Industry
  • Food Labeling / standards*
  • Food Packaging / standards
  • Health Policy*
  • Humans
  • Nutrition Policy
  • Policy Making*
  • Public Health / standards