Validation of an automated delirium prediction model (DElirium MOdel (DEMO)): an observational study

BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e016654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016654.

Abstract

Objectives: Delirium is an underdiagnosed, severe and costly disorder, and 30%-40% of cases can be prevented. A fully automated model to predict delirium (DEMO) in older people has been developed, and the objective of this study is to validate the model in a hospital setting.

Setting: Secondary care, one hospital with two locations.

Design: Observational study.

Participants: The study included 450 randomly selected patients over 60 years of age admitted to Zuyderland Medical Centre. Patients who presented with delirium on admission were excluded.

Primary outcome measures: Development of delirium through chart review.

Results: A total of 383 patients were included in this study. The analysis was performed for delirium within 1, 3 and 5 days after a DEMO score was obtained. Sensitivity was 87.1% (95% CI 0.756 to 0.939), 84.2% (95% CI 0.732 to 0.915) and 82.7% (95% CI 0.734 to 0.893) for 1, 3 and 5 days, respectively, after obtaining the DEMO score. Specificity was 77.9% (95% CI 0.729 to 0.882), 81.5% (95% CI 0.766 to 0.856) and 84.5% (95% CI 0.797 to 0.884) for 1, 3 and 5 days, respectively, after obtaining the DEMO score.

Conclusion: DEMO is a satisfactory prediction model but needs further prospective validation with in-person delirium confirmation. In the future, DEMO will be applied in clinical practice so that physicians will be aware of when a patient is at an increased risk of developing delirium, which will facilitate earlier recognition and diagnosis, and thus will allow the implementation of prevention measures.

Keywords: geriatric medicine; psychiatry.

Publication types

  • Observational Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Delirium / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment / methods*
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Psychological*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity