Methyllysine analogues (MLAs), furnished by aminoethylation of engineered cysteine residues, are widely used surrogates of histone methyllysine and are considered to be effective proxies for studying these epigenetic marks in vitro. Here we report the first structure of a trimethyllysine MLA histone in complex with a protein binding partner, quantify the thermodynamic distinctions between MLAs and their native methyllysine counterparts, and demonstrate that these differences can compromise qualitative interpretations of binding at the nucleosome level. Quantitative measurements with two methyllysine binding protein modules reveal substantial affinity losses for the MLA peptides versus the corresponding native methyllysine species in both cases, although the thermodynamic underpinnings are distinct. MLA and methyllysine adopt distinct conformational geometries when in complex with the BPTF PHD finger, a well-established H3K4me3 binding partner. In this case, an ∼13-fold Kd difference at the peptide level translates to nucleosomal affinities for MLA analogues that fall outside of the detectable range in a pull-down format, whereas the methyllysine species installed by native chemical ligation demonstrates robust binding. Thus, despite their facile production and commercial availability, there is a significant caveat of potentially altered binding affinity when MLAs are used in place of native methyllysine residues.