Pitfalls in studies of eosinopenia and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio

Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):163-174. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1388537. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

Abstract

There is a number of publications evaluating the eosinophil count and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio for diagnosis, prognosis or monitoring of patients. Of special interest is the use of these parameters for discrimination between the different causes of fever (e.g. bacterial versus viral vs. non-infectious causes of fever) and for monitoring the efficacy of therapy and predict the course of the patient. However, pitfalls in previous study designs prevent applicability to clinical practice. Here, we provide a short review of the relevant literature and summarize important factors that should be taken into account when designing studies, with special attention to the selection of a proper and clinically meaningful study population and the effects of the stress response and of corticosteroids.

Keywords: Eosinopenia; Eosinophil count; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte count ratio; Pitfalls.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Blood Cell Count
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Eosinophils / cytology*
  • Humans
  • Infections / blood*
  • Infections / diagnosis*
  • Lymphocytes / cytology*
  • Neutrophils / cytology*
  • Prognosis
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • Biomarkers