Predicted increases in the frequency and severity of droughts have led to a renewed focus on how plants physiologically adjust to low water availability. A popular framework for understanding plant responses to drought characterizes species along a spectrum from isohydry to anisohydry based on their regulation of gas exchange and leaf water potential under drying conditions. One prediction that arises from this theory is that plant drought responses may hinge, in part, on their usage of non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) pools. For example, trees that respond to drought by closing stomates (i.e., isohydric) are predicted to deplete NSC reserves to maintain metabolism, whereas plants that keep stomata open during water stress (i.e., anisohydric), may show little change or even increases in NSC concentration. However, empirical tests of this theory largely rely on aboveground measurements of NSC, ignoring the potentially conflicting responses of root NSC pools. We sought to test these predictions by subjecting potted saplings of Quercus alba L. (an anisohydric species) and Liriodendron tulipifera L. (an isohydric species) to a 6 week experimental drought. We found that stem NSC concentrations were depleted in the isohydric L. tulipifera but maintained in the anisohydric Q. alba-as predicted. However, when scaled to whole-plant NSC content, the drought-induced decreases in stem NSCs in L. tulipifera were offset by increases in root NSCs (especially soluble sugars), resulting in no net change to whole-plant NSC content. Similarly, root sugars increased in Q. alba in response to drought. This increase was concurrent with declines in growth, suggesting a potential trade-off between allocation of photoassimilates to root sugars vs biomass during drought. Collectively, our results suggest that the responses of NSC in coarse roots can differ from stems, and indicate a prominent role of coarse roots in mitigating drought-induced declines in whole-tree NSC pools.